- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Messages
- 645
I've got a couple questions that'd be lovely to see some insight on them.
a) Why is it, that everyone in eGO that gets banned for things/situations that are a constant issue coming from them (e.g. Someone constantly harassing other members, someone being a racist or baits racism, someone constantly disrupting gameplay in our servers), always seems to get a second chance? Last meeting this was discussed, we were promised less leniency, but I haven't seen that much improvement there as promised.
From what I understand this decision is discussed among Managers (and higher I assume), but the decision sometimes feels unreasonable, considering some people are known rule-breakers, yet they get a freedom pass, once they give out an Oscard-worthy performance on how they will "never" break X,Y rules again, yet are again back on the Contest Ban board, a week or a month later, only to just get their ban reduced if not completely erased.
b) Has it ever been an idea of having "server" specific managers (mainly targetting CS here)?
By that I mean, managers who can focus on their most played servers, and be able to have a better knowledge of the playerbase that plays specific servers only (eg someone who is heavily invested in TTT, so he/she does know which players are rulebreakers or someone who deserves a commendation in order to get admin eventually in the future), unlike the current scheme where there are CS Managers, whereas some of them, hardly even play all of the CS Servers (or any at all nowadays) enough to be able to judge wether someone deserves a second chance at being unbanned or should be commended to be an admin for example.
P.S. Thanks to the managers that still do play on TTT btw <3
a) Why is it, that everyone in eGO that gets banned for things/situations that are a constant issue coming from them (e.g. Someone constantly harassing other members, someone being a racist or baits racism, someone constantly disrupting gameplay in our servers), always seems to get a second chance? Last meeting this was discussed, we were promised less leniency, but I haven't seen that much improvement there as promised.
From what I understand this decision is discussed among Managers (and higher I assume), but the decision sometimes feels unreasonable, considering some people are known rule-breakers, yet they get a freedom pass, once they give out an Oscard-worthy performance on how they will "never" break X,Y rules again, yet are again back on the Contest Ban board, a week or a month later, only to just get their ban reduced if not completely erased.
b) Has it ever been an idea of having "server" specific managers (mainly targetting CS here)?
By that I mean, managers who can focus on their most played servers, and be able to have a better knowledge of the playerbase that plays specific servers only (eg someone who is heavily invested in TTT, so he/she does know which players are rulebreakers or someone who deserves a commendation in order to get admin eventually in the future), unlike the current scheme where there are CS Managers, whereas some of them, hardly even play all of the CS Servers (or any at all nowadays) enough to be able to judge wether someone deserves a second chance at being unbanned or should be commended to be an admin for example.
P.S. Thanks to the managers that still do play on TTT btw <3
Last edited:





















